Basil at www.IMAO.US writes:
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objective that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
What was that organization that Adolf Hitler had? Sturmabteilung? You know, the “Brown Shirts.”
Or maybe he wants to go straight to the Schutzstaffel, the “SS.”
Are those of us on the right the only ones that ever read books? Or that watched the Nazi shows on the History Channel instead of their “Search for Bigfoot” or “Roswell Uncovered” shows? Or that can think for ourselves?
Well sure, there are downsides to having the streets clogged with a civilian national security force. Let’s look on the plus side- a civilian national security force equal to the bad, bad military would be able to nuke Yosemite and bring about world peace, ala the IMAO.US author's famous “Nuke the Moon” thesis.
A civilian national security force is necessary to bring about peace, as Karl Marx famously said,”The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition of socialism.”
That term ‘civilian national security force’ is a bit wordy though.
So let’s try this.Babelfish translates the English “civilian national security force”to the German “Nationale ZivilSicherheitskraft”
That is quite the tongue tangler for us,
the (current) English speakers who could only say, “merci bocoup” when Europeans
So, I modestly propose we call the “civilian national security force”
or “Nationale ZivilSicherheitskraft”by the first two letters of
“NA tionale ZI vilSicherheitskraft”.
That’s much more hopeful and changy sounding, isn’t it?
Get out and VOTE!